Shortlist while the candidate is still interested
Client details anonymized at their request
Time to Shortlist
Projection — not a delivered client result
Based on a system we run: TBWX criteria-based lead scoring with immediate owner routing.
Assumptions
- 10 placements per month at $12,000 average fee
- 2 additional placements per month from faster shortlisting
- Candidate flow and job briefs are already digital
Industry
HR / Staffing
Services Used
What we already run. TBWX scores every inbound lead against defined criteria and routes it to an owner immediately. The same mechanics apply to a CV against a job brief — structured input, consistent scoring, instant assignment.
Why it transfers. In staffing, speed is the product. The agency that shortlists in three days wins the placement the agency shortlisting in twelve loses — and good candidates accept other offers while the pile is being read.
What it could be worth to you. An agency making 10 placements a month at a $12,000 average fee bills $1.44M a year. If faster shortlisting wins two additional placements a month, that is $24,000 monthly — $288,000 a year, from work already coming through the door.
Screening assists the recruiter, it does not replace judgement, and it needs auditing for bias before it touches live hiring. We would build that check in.
Projection based on the assumptions listed, not a delivered result.
Want Results Like These?
Every case study started with a 30-minute call. No contracts, no pitch decks.
Book Your Free Growth Call